Is this your business?
Claim your listing for free to respond to reviews, update your profile and manage your listing.
Claim Your BusinessLew Rockwell has a rating of 4 stars from 3 reviews, indicating that most customers are generally satisfied with their purchases. Lew Rockwell ranks 11th among Politics Other sites.
I have been a follower of this site for the past 8 years but it has changed for the worse in my opinion as it relates to its contributors. The 2 contributors who come accross as compketely unreliable are David Stockman and Judge Napolitano. Both appear guilty of supporting any position that reinforces their historical postions that have been deemed by others as predjuice or inaccurate. The Judge regardless of subject matter constantly bashes Trump and in doing so turns a blind eye to democrats who have done much worse. This renders any opinion by Napolitano worthless because it is a tainted opinion. Stockman in similar fashion just loves to bash anything MAGA. They both have the right to say whatever they want but in my opinion it damages the reputation of LewRockwell.com to a point where they have lost much.
This site only starts to make a little sense when it talks about economics, BUT, what it comes to everything else it doesn't deserve even three stars. Why would a website dedicated to being pro-free market and pro-smaller government attack Gary Johnson for not being Libertarian enough? Let alone during the Bush years they did not mind Michael Moore's pro-government credentials because they cared more about protesting the Iraq war. And what else irks me is that their economic model falls on the same level as Noam Chomsky's linguistic analysts which ARE CORRECT, but what they like to do is SUPPORT the opposite such as in the case of this frequent blogger at Lewrockwell.com: Https :// www.google. Com/search? Hl=en&safe=off&q=Daniel+McAdams%2C+Lewrockwell.com&oq=Daniel+McAdams%2C+Lewrockwell. Com&gs_l=serp. 3... 3117. 4971. 0. 5211.17.16. 0. 0. 0. 0. 142. 1087. 10j6. 16. 0. les%3Bepsugrer. 0.0... 1.1. Cq54LpKLOs4 Why support Vladimir Putin of Russia? http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/118287.html And also claim that the $#*! Riot is "run" by the CIA even though they're embraced by Occupy Wall Street? http://occupywallst.org/article/happening-now-$#*!riotnyc-solidarity-actions-impr/ Which btw, Lewrockwell. Com gave a full endorsement of the Occupiers who support $#*! Riot: http://lewrockwell.com/rep2/police-state-vs-occupy-wall-street.html This DOES NOT MAKE SENSE then to claim to support a cause that you never bothered to care to support at all. It'd be one thing to condemn the policies of the U.S. government, it's another thing to SHILL for another government's similar policies just because they happen to be on the other side which is so stupid!
I have been a follower of this site for the past 8 years but it has changed for the worse in my opinion as it relates to its contributors. The 2 contributors who come accross as compketely unreliable are David Stockman and Judge Napolitano. Both appear guilty of supporting any position that reinforces their historical postions that have been deemed by others as predjuice or inaccurate. The Judge regardless of subject matter constantly bashes Trump and in doing so turns a blind eye to democrats who have done much worse. This renders any opinion by Napolitano worthless because it is a tainted opinion. Stockman in similar fashion just loves to bash anything MAGA. They both have the right to say whatever they want but in my opinion it damages the reputation of LewRockwell.com to a point where they have lost much.
Lew Rockwell has a wealth of information, and is perfect for our time. Great articles with pertinent information and leads to excellent books.
This site only starts to make a little sense when it talks about economics, BUT, what it comes to everything else it doesn't deserve even three stars.
Why would a website dedicated to being pro-free market and pro-smaller government attack Gary Johnson for not being Libertarian enough? Let alone during the Bush years they did not mind Michael Moore's pro-government credentials because they cared more about protesting the Iraq war.
And what else irks me is that their economic model falls on the same level as Noam Chomsky's linguistic analysts which ARE CORRECT, but what they like to do is SUPPORT the opposite such as in the case of this frequent blogger at Lewrockwell.com:
Https :// www.google. Com/search? Hl=en&safe=off&q=Daniel+McAdams%2C+Lewrockwell.com&oq=Daniel+McAdams%2C+Lewrockwell. Com&gs_l=serp. 3... 3117. 4971. 0. 5211.17.16. 0. 0. 0. 0. 142. 1087. 10j6. 16. 0. les%3Bepsugrer. 0.0... 1.1. Cq54LpKLOs4
Why support Vladimir Putin of Russia?
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/*******.html
And also claim that the $#*! Riot is "run" by the CIA even though they're embraced by Occupy Wall Street?
http://occupywallst.org/article/happening-now-$#*!riotnyc-solidarity-actions-impr/
Which btw, Lewrockwell. Com gave a full endorsement of the Occupiers who support $#*! Riot:
http://lewrockwell.com/rep2/police-state-vs-occupy-wall-street.html
This DOES NOT MAKE SENSE then to claim to support a cause that you never bothered to care to support at all. It'd be one thing to condemn the policies of the U.S. government, it's another thing to SHILL for another government's similar policies just because they happen to be on the other side which is so stupid!
Is this your business?
Claim your listing for free to respond to reviews, update your profile and manage your listing.