Thumbnail of user peters1819

Peter S.

1
Level 1 Contributor
Pensacola FL

Contributor Level

Total Points
327

2 Reviews by Peter

  • Politicsforums

7/19/21

Hey, after a week at PoliticsForums.com I got banned. I suspect that while that is a stark record for me, it is nothing new to the website domain kicking out posters who dissent or disagree and say why.

Here's the flippant notification: "You have been banned for the following reason:
Don't come back. Date the ban will be lifted: Never."

The notice reveals and exposes the arbitrary and absolutist nature of the website posters themselves, ie, they make arbitrary declarations and summary pronouncements that indicate clearly you need to be in agreement with the website mods and posters or else.

Indeed, almost all posters in their only rightwing posts don't explain anything either. You're either in a rightwing agreement or you're gone. It's incestuous indeed and all of 'em love it, from the mods to the posters. Nothing contrary is allowed and it is rejected quickly.

I knew from reading posts at the hodgepodge smattering of Forum threads that are oriented to rightwing interests only that there were no dissenting posts. So I wanted to test whether the website is intolerant of dissenting views. I found out quickly what I began immediately to suspect ha -- it is not tolerant. It is absolutist armband right.

Nobody debates, nobody discusses, they only rightwing reinforce one another or only denounce me entirely because of my dissent against their nearly unanimous rightwing armband views. This unanimity also accounts for the domain's high approval rating by its members, none of which who write reviews have been banned. Reviews of the domain politicsforums.com are written by sapophiles and inhalers of rightwing autocratic and dictatorial politics in the USA with Trump plus Putin as their heroes.

So again, the reviews of this website domain are by overwhelmingly active members of it who are among the 98.6% members who are armband Gen. Milley hating Nazi rightwingers of Jan. 6th who the Army 4-star chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said accurately that they are.

Tip for consumers:
Virtually all posters and mods at this website domain have become what we fought against to defeat throughout the 20th century.

  • DebatePolitics

7/8/21

The Debate Politics Forum keeps going around in its well known and predictable circles, spinning its wheels interminably, this time busting a notorious and unsuitable Mod, Red Akston who several of we former members have exposed here, but replacing him with yet another sleazy and dishonest DP authority, DiAnna who has already been mentioned here too.

Here's what the DP rightwing owner who goes by the username Schweddy said in trying to make a soft and gentle explosion of this big bomb announcement:

"It's with regret to say *******@RedAkston is stepping down as a mod. To be clear, he will not issue warnings or work in a mod capacity going forward. In the event the mod team needs temp help, he as [sic] agreed to step in and we appreciate his willingness to do so."

Blah blah in the last sentence of course, not to mention the Debate Politics Forum needing a literate owner who is attentive to his work product.

Red Akston being busted from busting DP members comes two months after Akston banned me as I was in my 7th consecutive year as a regular at DP, to include most prominently my military expertise that also included a smash hit Military Cadet thread I began in 2018 and that, as of Red Akston banning me several months ago, had more than 41,000 views and more than 500 video posts by me that DP readers viewed regularly -- members and visitors alike.

I've already posted about Red Akston banning me under completely false and dishonest pretenses. And I've also posted that the new Mod DiAnna posted several times over the years that she hates my posts, and hates reading them. Indeed, DiAnna is aligned openly and admittedly with a shallow rightwing poster who stalked me from the time I joined DP, with their purpose that I "GTFO" of DP. Failing at that over the years, their guy Red Akston stepped in shamelessly to ban me under dishonest and concocted pretenses.

So Red Akston getting the boot from moderating only to be succeeded by DiAnna is a less than zero improvement for the Debate Politics Forum where Trump fascists spewing their hate and lies rule.

So while Red Akston stays on at DP as Admin and for his woeful technical fakery -- to include his trying unsuccessfully to technically sabotage my Military Cadet thread -- Akston has now been stripped of his authority to suspend or ban members, or to take any action against posters. DiAnna does however get this new authority so the end result is no change at this "dangerous" website that also has accurately been called "creepy" and "hateful" by other reviewers here.

Service
Value
Quality

Peter Has Earned 7 Votes

Peter S.'s review of DebatePolitics earned 7 Very Helpful votes

Peter hasn’t received any thanks yous.

Peter doesn’t have any fans yet.

Peter is Following 1 User

Thumbnail of user rolot1
rolo t.
1 Review
13 Votes

Empty.

Similar Reviewers on Sitejabber

Thumbnail of user jacksshop
12/16/23

I was banned and told, I would be reinstated on December 16,2023. That was a lie. The site is...

Thumbnail of user arthurp402
8/4/23

After being on the site for a few weeks, and seeing exactly what most of the other users get up...