• JohnBrown4x4

Overview

JohnBrown4x4 has a rating of 3 stars from 16 reviews, indicating that most customers are generally dissatisfied with their purchases. Reviewers complaining about JohnBrown4x4 most frequently mention land rover problems. JohnBrown4x4 ranks 49th among Used Cars sites.

  • Service
    5
  • Value
    5
  • Shipping
    3
  • Returns
    2
  • Quality
    6
4
See all photos

What reviewers want you to know

Positive highlights

No positive highlights yet

Critical highlights

  • Purchased a SWB Land Rover Series 3 from John Brown 4x4 Ltd for £14,495.00.
How would you rate JohnBrown4x4?
Top Positive Review

“Landrover Soft Top”

Andrew P.
9/16/20

Great experience buying our LR from John and his team - always on end of phone or email to help and assist - would definitely recommend and will be using again!

Top Critical Review

“Beware! Be very cautious about buying a Land Rover from here.”

Nigel S.
2/26/22

John Brown's Land Rover looked lovely on their website. BUT underneath was the worst I have ever seen. Shame I drove 200 miles for a wasted visit but thank goodness I declined to pay their non-refundable deposit (?!) before viewing! Springs (a vital component) should not look like this. And nor should important parts be cable tied on. And so the list goes on. Avoid at all costs.

Reviews (16)

Rating

Timeframe

Other

Reviews that mention popular keywords

land rover (7)
Thumbnail of user andrewp1178
1 review
0 helpful votes
September 16th, 2020

Great experience buying our LR from John and his team - always on end of phone or email to help and assist - would definitely recommend and will be using again!

Thumbnail of user nigels373
1 review
3 helpful votes
February 26th, 2022

John Brown's Land Rover looked lovely on their website. BUT underneath was the worst I have ever seen. Shame I drove 200 miles for a wasted visit but thank goodness I declined to pay their non-refundable deposit (?!) before viewing! Springs (a vital component) should not look like this. And nor should important parts be cable tied on. And so the list goes on. Avoid at all costs.

Service
Value
Returns
Quality
Thumbnail of user gm197
1 review
3 helpful votes
January 4th, 2019

I recently bought my series 2a Land Rover from John Brown 4x4.

I had zero experience in buying an older car and went on the live chat to ask some questions. John Jr. Replied pretty much straight away. Our conversation was candid and allayed my initial concerns.

My visit to the premesis was pleasant and both Johns were jovial and talked honestly about how to take care of and maintain my new toy.

If you are looking for an honest talking, family run business to supply you with a Land Rover I would recommend them.

Service
Quality
Thumbnail of user martinv142
1 review
5 helpful votes
November 29th, 2021

I contacted John Brown as I wanted a 'classic' Land Rover' for use on the airfield and to be used as a way to show off our logo when on the tarmac and was taken in by his helpful and fast response.

He told me that this car was owned and sold to them due to the sad passing of a member Land Rover Club of Great Britain and they were left it in the will and had renovated it and were now selling it to do another project.

I have no idea if any of this is true but it gave me confidence in the decision to buy for £13K plus extras that I wanted fitting.

John told me that it would be a great car and a great investment and it was impossible to lose money on it.

I should have been a bit smarter when he suggested that I pay them to add an electronic ignition, why would it need that if it had had such loving care.

The car was delivered on a trailer and it was clear from the first moment that it was not as described.

The ignition was an issue as was the distributor and they were not prepared to come and fix it but they did send a new one and I got a local garage to fix it, they did pay for this.

After that I decided to get it serviced even though it was supposed to have been fully serviced, I had done three miles at this point

It was clear that John Brown have a different view of "a service" versus a Land Rover dealer who presented me with an estimate of £6,000 plus to fix issues, I decided to use a more local garage and they sorted it for £2,000, which included bakes and an exhaust system.

16 months on and maybe 60 miles of driving on the airfield, so as I was not using it I exchanged chat messages with John Brown as on his site they say they are keen to buy cars like mine who asked me to send pictures

He then asked what I wanted for it as he "always wanted Land Rover 2's" and he remembered EYL!

I asked him to make an offer, and he said £7K

Quite a shock

But here is what makes him and his company a joke and liars

His rationale was that its all the fault of HMRC as they take 20% VAT and then corporation tax take 20% and he needs to make a profit so he needs to buy at 50% of retail

What a load of nonsense.

Any accountant knows that VAT is on the profit element and that corporation tax is on the performance of the company and not the sale price of the car.

Buyer beware, I was stupid from day one trusting him, but the nonsense he spouts when wanting to buy cars from you is so stupid that he has is either a moron, cheat, liar or a has lost his marbles.

I have documentary evidence of all of this and I do not hide my name so before selling to him, check any other source and if you do buy, then get an Independent pre-buy inspection.

Or, just avoid at all costs, I am not alone in this, just Google John Brown reviews and read about another customer that had to get a Barrister involved.

I have attached a screen shot of the car before I bought it that is still on his website now.

Avoid buying from John Brown Land Rover, and read as many reviews as you can of John Brown before buying a Classic Land Rover

Tip for consumers:
Read all the proper reviews and not the fake positive ones on Google, you can tell they are fake as they only have ones where the reviews are positive

Products used:
Land Rover 2A

Value
Shipping
Quality
Thumbnail of user bens241
1 review
16 helpful votes
October 6th, 2017

Usual story - website looks good - car looks good - cant do enough for you etc.

Then the problems begin- very shoddy workmanship on close inspection - impossible to speak to after sale - story after story - cut my losses and moved the vehicle on quickly - my advice - avoid - used series prices have peaked and these guys are having to discount to shift stock - they are not a sound investment - try to get back what you paid - i think you will have a problem - I took a 10k loss to be rid of the vehicle they supplied me! Be warned

Thumbnail of user johnb348
John B. – JohnBrown4x4 Rep

We find it very sad that competitors and bogus customers feel the need to create stories like this. We have never had a customer by the name of Ben S surprisingly. Our workmanship is second to none, and our trained technicians take great pride in their work. "Impossible to speak after sale?". Utter tosh! We take calls on evenings and weekends if our customers need us. We operate a fair warranty system which we stand by - as an example we had a customer last week who reported some problems with noise in his overdrive - this had developed over the course of 1000 miles or so. We collected the vehicle without cost to him, fitted a replacement unit (fitted retail price £1250), and once repaired we delivered it back to him, again, without charge. This is his TRUE comment to us - "HHR 256K arrived here at The Tower, on Tuesday afternoon. I haven't had any free time to try it until today. Having now done so, I am happy to say, it drove very well. Dealing with John Brown 4x4 has been a pleasurable experience. Kind regards, John Glenn.
As you can see, this customer service does not reflect the comments left in this review, nor any other genuine review.
"Used series prices have peaked"... have they? No, they haven't Series prices are continually rising and will continue to do so. We don't discount any of our stock. The screen price is the price you pay.
With regards to investment, if you buy from a dealer at retail, and then ask for a quick buy back at trade you will obviously lose money - we pay tax and VAT on every vehicle we sell and that's why we have to offer less to buy it back. Customers who keep their cars a few years and then come back to us often make a profit due to appreciation in that time. If you bought a brand new Land Rover for £100,000 would you be surprised to find that the buy back after a week was £80,000? Probably not. When GENUINE customers want a swift return after purchase (sometimes customers find the vehicle too uncomfortable for example) we offer a commissioned sale - in this manner customers manage to claw back nearly all of their investment, even after a short period - so this notion of losing £10,000 is simply ridiculous.
So there you have it - please read these spiteful sitejabber reviews with a pinch of salt, then read our testimonials on the website - we have current and past customers who are more than happy to tell you about us if you wish. We will continue to operate as we have always done - honestly and fairly. It's a shame not everyone is like us!
On a closing note, some of this review is accurate - the website does look good (thanks, we work hard to keep it current and up to date), the cars look good because we don't just mechanically prepare them, we clean and detail them throughout, and yes, we can't do enough for you to get you the Series Land Rover you've always dreamed of!

Thumbnail of user richardh289
1 review
11 helpful votes
January 4th, 2018

Rang to try and purchase a land rover apparently they don't open on Saturdays then got snotty when i said it was starting to get a bit complicated, i only wanted to buy one of his cars still never mind there are lots of other land rover garages who do want to sell their land rovers.

Thumbnail of user aubl
1 review
18 helpful votes
January 2nd, 2019

Purchased a SWB Land Rover Series 3 from John Brown 4x4 Ltd for £14,495.00. Massive MOT fail 11 months after purchase only to discover that: this car did not have a 2.25 engine, it did not have Range Rover Differentials, because of John Brown 4x4's misrepresentation it had been driven uninsured, because of John Brown 4x4's misrepresentation it had been illegal to drive, it was deemed unroadworthy by the DVSA as well as by an independent Land Rover expert and author. Fullest documentation with pictures on https://serieslandroverreview.co.uk/

Tip for consumers:
Be extremely cautious when you deal with these rogues. At the very least take the advice given in https://serieslandroverreview.co.uk/buyer-beware/

Products used:
We ended up instructing a Barrister to give John Brown 4x4 Ltd one final opportunity to right a wrong. Car is unroadworthy and had to be put on SORN.

Service
Value
Shipping
Returns
Quality
Thumbnail of user timh83
1 review
22 helpful votes
November 14th, 2016

Had a bad experience with these people, advert looked great, nice people on the phone. Alarm bells should have sounded after I tried to speak with the same person. Dealt with 4 people during the sale, one person was very defensive when I tired to talk with the original contact. Was going to leave it at a short google review but they seem to have had it removed. I will post and break down of my whole experience if they respond. If they don't... my advice is... MAKE SURE YOU VIEW BEFORE YOU BUY>

Thumbnail of user stevenm80
1 review
25 helpful votes
August 16th, 2014

If you really want to buy a Land Rover from this company it is imperative that you take a Land Rover specialist with you to view and test drive first, unless you are an expert yourself. If you are lucky you may find a vehicle that lives up to the online description, it will probably be over priced although they say they are "priced to sell". I found out the hard way as I didn't fancy a 1000 mile round trip and trusted their "reputation".

Service
Value
Shipping
Quality
Thumbnail of user xxxxx6
1 review
8 helpful votes
December 18th, 2014
Thumbnail of user johnb348
John B. – JohnBrown4x4 Rep

This customer contacted us a week or so ago, with reference to purchasing a Land Rover Series 3 from us. This vehicle was a trade in from a customer, and was driven by him, from London, to our premises in Yorkshire, where he exchanged it for a camper, as he wished to own a vehicle he could camp in. He had owned the vehicle for some ten years, and informed us that he was sorry to see it go, and that it had never let him down. The vehicle is a rare diesel, tax exempt, and has a valuable Capstan winch fitted, which he demonstrated to me. As such, it is a desirable vehicle. The MOT on it was supplied by his local garage, and had some 5 or so months remaining.
The vehicle was put through our in house schedule, as all our vehicles are, and it was road tested. It was found to be a very nice driving Series 3, which is uncommon in early diesels, as they tend to be very agricultural. This was not.
The vehicle was listed for sale on our website.
When Mr Tuttle called, I was not in the unit, and our workshop manager took the call. Mr Tuttle offered £7,200 for the vehicle, advertised on our site at £7,995. The workshop manager contacted me to ask my opinion about the offer. Our vehicles are priced carefully, and we don't always have a large margin to work with. I told him that the only premise on which a vehicle would be sold with that sort of discount, would be to a trader, at a trade price. Within the trade, a trade sale is generally understood that you accept the vehicle in the condition provided, and with no recourse with regards to warranty or subsequent action. This information was forwarded to Mr Tuttle, who insisted that he wished to proceed on a trade basis, at a purchase price of £7,200 with no warranty implied or given.
To confirm this sale, we sent, as we always do, our confirmation of purchase email, which gives all the information we are required to send by law. It gives customers their rights to return under what was the distance selling regulations, as well as relaying information about the vehicle, customer modifications, special requests etc etc. In one section of the email there is a section marked " Additional notes/conditions of purchase". This section is right at the top of the email, and is both clear and obvious. Under that section I wrote, in line with the telephone conversation
"Trade Sale (£800 discount on asking price) with no warranty implied or given."

Mr Tuttle entered into a trade sale and contract with us, received written confirmation via email on Wednesday 10th December, yet in his email of 18th December he writes
"Please note this is not a trade sale I am not a trader." Clearly, Mr Tuttle is not reporting events as they happened.

When Mr Tuttle received his vehicle, we hear from the independent delivery company that he seemed satisfied with it. There was talk of him rebuilding it in times future.
At 3pm on the day after delivery, our office staff received a phone call from Mr Tuttle saying that he had had the vehicle inspected by a garage and there were numerous faults with it, making it unsafe. He followed this call up, within the hour, with an email, and a video he recorded of a mechanic supposedly impartially assessing the condition of the vehicle.
At this point it is prudent to say that when we sell a vehicle at the asking price, we offer a full money back, no quibble, on return of the vehicle to our unit. We also offer our in-house 3 month warranty, which covers major mechanical components. Had Mr Tuttle decided to buy under these terms, we would have also elected to put a new MOT on the vehicle. Obviously, a garage down south decided the vehicle was fit for 12 months MOT, but with only 4 1/2 months remaining, we would normally prefer to have our MOT inspectors apply a new MOT. This gives us extra peace of mind that we have also inspected the vehicle for safe running, and that an independent source has ratified that. As this vehicle was taken under a trade agreement, this process was not undertaken. Had Mr Tuttle bought from us, in the manner we sell to the general public, he would have had the right to return the vehicle to us for a refund, if he was not happy with it.
Mr Tuttle continued to contact us on the day after delivery, and set an ultimatum of the close of business that day, otherwise he would take further action immediately. This gave the company one hour to respond to his concerns. He wrote,
" I will also be contacting trading standards. The BBC watchdog and will also email the BBC to contact Hugh Fearnley Whittingstall. I will also join and post my comments on every LandRover forum and Facebook page. I will professionally video all the issues with the landrover and attach to web page forums and Facebook. I will ensure that the video I make and the comments I make are all SEO optimised so that anyone searching will find my feedback."
He also added in an email the following day,
"I will make sure every one knows how you have ripped me off. I shall be posting 5 or 6 links every day. See you at the small claims court"
It is regretful that Mr Tuttle elected not to follow our tried and tested Customer Complaints procedure before electing to take to forums with his comments and videos.

It seems to me in this case there are three main issues
1) the fact that Mr Tuttle accepted a trade sale and subsequently denied this despite email evidence
2) whether the vehicle sold was road worthy
3) Mr Tuttles actions in response to the issue.

In answering 1), we have clear evidence that this sale was discounted as a trade sale with no warranty, of which Mr Tuttle was completely aware.
At point 3) we are disappointed that Mr Tuttle gave us one hour to compile a response to his issues before he embarked on a campaign involving defamation of our company and our reputation. Indeed, Mr Tuttle gave us a 4pm deadline to agree a refund, yet the email he sent containing this information contained a link to YouTube, where Mr Tuttle had already filed "video evidence". Mr Tuttle, then, had already proceeded on his smear campaign before we had the opportunity to consider the case in full and compile our response after consultation with our legal team.
Mr Tuttle has, since this point, been true to his word. He has attempted to file complaints on the companies Facebook page, and had his friends do the same. He has filed the video on various websites (YouTube, Landyzone) and has completed reviews on Sitejabber as well as listing on various other sites/posts.

So to the video and vehicle assessment. This was carried out at a garage that sells modern vehicles-range rovers etc. I cannot say what their experience is with dealing with 40 year old Series vehicles. At the price Mr Tuttle payed, he bought a bodily straight, tax exempt Series 3, which was both smartly presented, and in good mechanical order. It had an MOT supplied by the previous keeper, expiring in April 2014.
I have viewed the video, and note the following, in response to the issues raised.

Heater motor... the video highlighted a perforation in the heater box, and a seized heater motor. Our workshop manager stated that the motor did work when at the unit. It is not uncommon for motors not to work, or matrices in the heater to leak... so then the previous owner disconnects it... where possible we endeavour to repair heaters as they are well worth having even if they are not too effective. We believe this heater functioned. The small perforation in the mild steel heater casing would only cause a small quantity of air to escape... the majority of it would find it's way into the cabin. The mechanic who assessed this, highlighted that it was dangerous, as you would not be able to see where you are going... I wonder then, what all the people do, who drive series 1s with no heater fitted at the factory. I have one such vehicle! It's not dangerous as the mechanic suggests or an MOT failure.

Winch
The winch worked perfectly on test at the unit. I was shown it working by the former keeper. I'm assuming that as a pin seems to have come away from the engaging dog, that it has worked loose. A simple fix.

Battery insecure
Land Rover batteries are seated in delved cradle. They are deemed secure without the fitment of a battery clamp, and all vehicles submitted for MOT by us, without battery clamps, pass their MOTs. I believe the "specialist mechanic" is wrong in his claims.

Brake Box/Bulkhead

This vehicle was manufactured in 1973. It has a mild steel bulkhead. Unless a vehicle of this type is nut and bolt restored, it will undoubtedly have seen repair to the bulkhead. The repairs highlighted were all undertaken BEFORE the last MOT. They were deemed safe, and our inspection did not share the view that the pedal box was in any way insecure and the additional patch was seam welded from the back. The brake lights worked perfectly in our unit and on delivery although loose connections on old vehicles can be responsible for sudden failure of lights.

The small perforation in the bulkhead behind the pedal spring is not, in our opinion, an MOT failure, further compounded by the fact that it gained it's last MOT in that condition. In an ideal world, I would have like to have seen this perforation rectified at our workshop, and I will ensure that a visual inspection of the vulnerable areas of the bulkhead is highlighted on future schedules. This is, however, a simple and cheap fix.

Door Corrosion

All older Land rovers will suffer corrosion to the mild steel inner frames. Its always a difficult decision to when to replace a whole door, when it's just the frame that has suffered. In some cases, particularly original vehicles, it's better to repair the original door than replace with a new one... original doors always close better than a pattern replacement. In the case of these doors, it was elected to leave the originals in situ, and allow the new owner the opportunity to decide how they would like to approach it. Had Mr Tuttle asked on the telephone, as many do, we would happily have talked him around the vehicle, candidly, highlighting the good, and not so good. We have no interest in selling vehicles to people by misrepresentation, as we want them to be happy with their purchase. Should Mr Tuttle wish to replace his door bottoms, they are £48 each. His £800 purchase discount would allow for this.

Seat belts
The video spends around a third of it's run time on the seat belts. Landrover seat belts can be mounted in a variety of positions, not just the factory points. As long as the belts are securely and safely fitted they are satisfactory for Mot purposes. We did not fit the belts. The belts, as fitted, passed the mot. The mechanic, once again, advising that the belts are unsafe, and an mot fail, is advising incorrectly.

Painting
We have received criticism from Mr Tuttle that the vehicle was not the original colour, and that it had been subsequently painted. It is very rare for a Land Rover to be presented, 40 years down the line, in the original colour. We have just purchased a blue Lightweight, that was Green... and it would have been blue in the forces. Anyone who knows anything about series vehicles, understands that they are often subject to colour changes throughout their life, in the same way that are also subject to engine changes. It's not a valid point.

Oil leaks.
Every Series land rover in the land will be oily, from front to back. Oil leaks need to be attended to when they become serious. This is highlighted by either active leaks when running, or a considerable pool of oil at rest. This vehicle behaved as any other this age, with misting and dribbles from all the various and vulnerable places. Our land rovers can dribble oil because we fill all the levels unlike many other traders, who may send out a vehicle without topping up levels. In our assessment, the oil leaks were completely in line with expectations on a vehicle of this age and price point. Perhaps the independent mechanic was not experienced enough in vintage Land Rovers to assess whether a leak is serious or not.

Chassis.
In the mechanics words "the chassis is solid." It's nice to note that Mr Tuttles independent mechanic found something complimentary about the vehicle. It's perhaps a shame that he failed to mention the super sweet, low mileage diesel engine, the slick gear change, the light steering, the benefit of tax exemption, the desirability of a Capstan winch, or the fact that this vehicle was driven the length of England just a few weeks before without issue.
The video shows two perforations under the front spring hangers, which we know were not present upon sale, as the Schutzing that was done on request from Mr Tuttle, is applied at this point. It seems that these areas have been weakened and perforated. Had Mr Tuttle gone through our standard sales procedure, we would have presented this vehicle for MOT at GRB in Coxwold. They would have used their CAT tool to assess the chassis, and if they had managed to perforate the chassis, we would have rectified this and presented the vehicle back for MOT. This happens regularly in hard to reach or hidden places, and that's why a garage like ours prefers to use independent garages for MOTs.

In short, although the video highlights some areas that may benefit from future improvement and restoration, it, in no way, renders the vehicle unsafe, faulty or unsatisfactory. 40 year old Land Rovers® will always have elements on them that can be improved... customers who wish to have a "like new" vehicle, can enlist us to bespoke build to new standards. We sell vehicles from £4995 to £21,995. Mr Tuttle bought an unrestored vehicle at the lower end of our price ranges. Despite this, he acquired a desirable unit, with desirable feature, as previously mentioned. The vehicle was deemed roadworthy at last MOT, and our inspection highlighted, that, considering we are dealing with an old, unrestored vehicle, that it was fit for road use. In claiming that a vehicle has some faults, and is therefore not fit for purpose is not entirely fair... a vintage Land Rover is fit for trundling around in, tinkering with, popping out to the local pub on a Sunday, or just being shown. They are not new, not modern, and will, by their very nature, have wearing parts. We make it very clear, both on the website, and in the emails we send, that these vehicles are elderly, and will not perform like a newer vehicle. We state,
"All old Land Rovers will have something that can be improved upon, however good they look..."

In summary, we are very disappointed at the manner in which this purchase has been conducted by Mr Tuttle. He has attempted to deceive the manner in which he purchased this vehicle, has threatened to slander and defame the good name our company has worked hard to achieve, has not allowed us due time or process to consider best steps in resolving the issues raises and has attempted to embellish weaknesses in the vehicle purchased to gain leverage post sale.
We firmly believe we are a transparent and honest company, supplying vintage vehicles in the best condition possible at the price point. We have a sound customer base and many happy clients, of which we are very proud.
Despite our regret in how Mr Tuttle has approached concerns he has with his purchase we will continue to strive to amicably resolve the issues and will take the necessary steps in ensuring that all dealings, from both parties, have been conducted, within the confines of English Law.
John Brown

Thumbnail of user albertw61
1 review
2 helpful votes
January 4th, 2019

After purchasing a lightweight a couple of years back from John Brown 4x4 I have made a number of calls to them for advise, the most recent was just the other week and as always they were on hand to guide me and resolve my problem. Thank you Guys

Thumbnail of user ashleyn61
1 review
4 helpful votes
October 18th, 2017

Wanted to say a massive thank you to all the great staff at John brown 4x4. Everyone has been so helpful from start to finish and guided me thought my first ever Land Rover. I will defo pass on your details to my friends. Thanks again!

Thumbnail of user richl32
1 review
7 helpful votes
November 14th, 2016

I recently bought a landy from these guys. I particularly enjoyed their honesty and guidance when I went to view. I know a bit about landlies but they didn't try and cover things up. They pointed out the faults and made sure that I understood what owning an old Land Rover is all about. The vehicle I chose and received was thoroughly gone through and parts replaced that they needn't have done. Overall a really pleasant experience.

Service
Value
Quality
Thumbnail of user neila21
1 review
5 helpful votes
November 15th, 2016

Had the pleasure of buying a LR from John Brown 4x4 a few months back and have to say the dog and myself love this vehicle, it's used almost everyday to disappear into the forest for long walks through the mud without the worry of climbing back in and spoiling the interior. I have to say that the service received from John and his team from start to finish was excellent. Thanks again Neil and Barnaby(the dog)

Thumbnail of user domd2
1 review
10 helpful votes
November 14th, 2016

Dealt with John Brown 4x4 on two seperae occasions and each time have been thoroughly satisfied. There attention to detail is very good, knowledge of the product excellent.

Thumbnail of user jb126
1 review
3 helpful votes
December 23rd, 2014

This customer contacted us a week or so ago, with reference to purchasing a Land Rover® Series 3 from us. This vehicle was a trade in from a customer, and was driven by him, from London, to our premises in Yorkshireicon, where he exchanged it for a camper, as he wished to own a vehicle he could camp in. He had owned the vehicle for some ten years, and informed us that he was sorry to see it go, and that it had never let him down. The vehicle is a rare diesel, tax exempt, and has a valuable Capstan winch fitted, which he demonstrated to me. As such, it is a desirable vehicle. The MOT on it was supplied by his local garage, and had some 5 or so months remaining.

The vehicle was put through our in house schedule, as all our vehicles are, and it was road tested. It was found to be a very nice driving Series 3, which is uncommon in early diesels, as they tend to be very agricultural. This was not.

The vehicle was listed for sale on our website.

When Mr XXXXXXXXX called, I was not in the unit, and our workshop manager took the call. Mr XXXXXXXXX offered £7,200 for the vehicle, advertised on our site at £7,995. The workshop manager contacted me to ask my opinion about the offer. Our vehicles are priced carefully, and we don't always have a large margin to work with. I told him that the only premise on which a vehicle would be sold with that sort of discount, would be to a trader, at a trade price. Within the trade, a trade sale is generally understood that you accept the vehicle in the condition provided, and with no recourse with regards to warranty or subsequent action. This information was forwarded to Mr XXXXXXXXX, who insisted that he wished to proceed on a trade basis, at a purchase price of £7,200 with no warranty implied or given.

To confirm this sale, we sent, as we always do, our confirmation of purchase email, which gives all the information we are required to send by law. It gives customers their rights to return under what was the distance selling regulations, as well as relaying information about the vehicle, customer modifications, special requests etc etc. In one section of the email there is a section marked " Additional notes/conditions of purchase". This section is right at the top of the email, and is both clear and obvious. Under that section I wrote, in line with the telephone conversation

"Trade Sale (£800 discount on asking price) with no warranty implied or given."

Mr XXXXXXXXX entered into a trade sale and contract with us, received written confirmation via email on Wednesday 10th December, yet in his email of 18th December he writes
"Please note this is not a trade sale I am not a trader." Clearly, Mr XXXXXXXXX is not reporting events as they happened.

When Mr XXXXXXXXX received his vehicle, we hear from the independent delivery company that he seemed satisfied with it. There was talk of him rebuilding it in times future.

At 3pm on the day after delivery, our office staff received a phone callicon from Mr XXXXXXX saying that he had had the vehicle inspected by a garage and there were numerous faults with it, making it unsafe. He followed this call up, within the hour, with an email, and a video he recorded of a mechanic supposedly impartially assessing the condition of the vehicle.

At this point it is prudent to say that when we sell a vehicle at the asking price, we offer a full money back, no quibble, on return of the vehicle to our unit. We also offer our in-house 3 month warranty, which covers major mechanical components. Had Mr XXXXXXXXX decided to buy under these terms, we would have also elected to put a new MOT on the vehicle. Obviously, a garage down south decided the vehicle was fit for 12 months MOT, but with only 4 1/2 months remaining, we would normally prefer to have our MOT inspectors apply a new MOT. This gives us extra peace of mind that we have also inspected the vehicle for safe running, and that an independent source has ratified that. As this vehicle was taken under a trade agreement, this process was not undertaken. Had Mr XXXXXXXXXXX bought from us, in the manner we sell to the general public, he would have had the right to return the vehicle to us for a refund, if he was not happy with it.
Mr XXXXXXXXXXX continued to contact us on the day after delivery, and set an ultimatum of the close of business that day, otherwise he would take further action immediately. This gave the company one hour to respond to his concerns. He wrote,

" I will also be contacting trading standards. The BBC watchdog and will also email the BBC to contact Hugh Fearnley Whittingstall. I will also join and post my comments on every Land Rover® forum and Facebook page. I will professionally video all the issues with the landrover and attach to web page forums and Facebook. I will ensure that the video I make and the comments I make are all SEO optimised so that anyone searching will find my feedback."

He also added in an email the following day,

"I will make sure every one knows how you have ripped me off. I shall be posting 5 or 6 links every day. See you at the small claimsicon court"

It is regretful that Mr XXXXXXXXXX elected not to follow our tried and tested Customer Complaints procedure before electing to take to forums with his comments and videos.

It seems to me in this case there are three main issues
1) the fact that Mr XXXXXXXXX accepted a trade sale and subsequently denied this despite email evidence
2) whether the vehicle sold was road worthy
3) Mr XXXXXXXXX actions in response to the issue.

In answering 1), we have clear evidence that this sale was discounted as a trade sale with no warranty, of which Mr XXXXXXXXXX was completely aware.

At point 3) we are disappointed that Mr XXXXXXXXXX gave us one hour to compile a response to his issues before he embarked on a campaign involving defamation of our company and our reputation. Indeed, Mr XXXXXXXXXXX gave us a 4pm deadline to agree a refund, yet the email he sent containing this information contained a link to YouTube, where Mr XXXXXXXXXX had already filed "video evidence". Mr XXXXXXXXX, then, had already proceeded on his smear campaign before we had the opportunity to consider the case in full and compile our response after consultation with our legal team.

Mr XXXXXXXXX has, since this point, been true to his word. He has attempted to file complaints on the companies Facebook page, and had his friends do the same. He has filed the video on various websites (YouTube, Landyzone) and has completed reviews on Sitejabber as well as listing on various other sites/posts.

So to the video and vehicle assessment. This was carried out at a garage that sells modern vehicles-range rovers etc. I cannot say what their experience is with dealing with 40 year old Series vehicles. At the price Mr XXXXXXXXX payed, he bought a bodily straight, tax exempt Series 3, which was both smartly presented, and in good mechanical order. It had an MOT supplied by the previous keeper, expiring in April 2014.
I have viewed the video, and note the following, in response to the issues raised.

Heater motor... the video highlighted a perforation in the heater box, and a seized heater motor. Our workshop manager stated that the motor did work when at the unit. It is not uncommon for motors not to work, or matrices in the heater to leak... so then the previous owner disconnects it... where possible we endeavour to repair heaters as they are well worth having even if they are not too effective. We believe this heater functioned. The small perforation in the mild steel heater casing would only cause a small quantity of air to escape... the majority of it would find it's way into the cabin. The mechanic who assessed this, highlighted that it was dangerous, as you would not be able to see where you are going... I wonder then, what all the people do, who drive series 1s with no heater fitted at the factory. I have one such vehicle! It's not dangerous as the mechanic suggests or an MOT failure.

Winch

The winch worked perfectly on test at the unit. I was shown it working by the former keeper. I'm assuming that as a pin seems to have come away from the engaging dog, that it has worked loose. A simple fix.

Battery insecure

Land Rover batteries are seated in delved cradle. They are deemed secure without the fitment of a battery clamp, and all vehicles submitted for MOT by us, without battery clamps, pass their MOTs. I believe the "specialist mechanic" is wrong in his claims.

Brake Box/Bulkhead

This vehicle was manufactured in 1973. It has a mild steel bulkhead. Unless a vehicle of this type is nut and bolt restored, it will undoubtedly have seen repair to the bulkhead. The repairs highlighted were all undertaken BEFORE the last MOT. They were deemed safe, and our inspection did not share the view that the pedal box was in any way insecure and the additional patch was seam welded from the back. The brake lights worked perfectly in our unit and on delivery although loose connections on old vehicles can be responsible for sudden failure of lights.

The small perforation in the bulkhead behind the pedal spring is not, in our opinion, an MOT failure, further compounded by the fact that it gained it's last MOT in that condition. In an ideal world, I would have like to have seen this perforation rectified at our workshop, and I will ensure that a visual inspection of the vulnerable areas of the bulkhead is highlighted on future schedules. This is, however, a simple and cheap fix.

Door Corrosion

All older Land rovers will suffer corrosion to the mild steel inner frames. Its always a difficult decision to when to replace a whole door, when it's just the frame that has suffered. In some cases, particularly original vehicles, it's better to repair the original door than replace with a new one... original doors always close better than a pattern replacement. In the case of these doors, it was elected to leave the originals in situ, and allow the new owner the opportunity to decide how they would like to approach it. Had Mr XXXXXXXXX asked on the telephone, as many do, we would happily have talked him around the vehicle, candidly, highlighting the good, and not so good. We have no interesticon in selling vehicles to people by misrepresentation, as we want them to be happy with their purchase. Should Mr XXXXXXXXX wish to replace his door bottoms, they are £48 each. His £800 purchase discount would allow for this.

Seat belts

The video spends around a third of it's run time on the seat belts. Land Rover® seat belts can be mounted in a variety of positions, not just the factory points. As long as the belts are securely and safely fitted they are satisfactory for Mot purposes. We did not fit the belts. The belts, as fitted, passed the mot. The mechanic, once again, advising that the belts are unsafe, and an mot fail, is advising incorrectly.

Painting

We have received criticism from Mr XXXXXXXXXX that the vehicle was not the original colour, and that it had been subsequently painted. It is very rare for a Land Rover® to be presented, 40 years down the line, in the original colour. We have just purchased a blue Lightweight, that was Green... and it would have been blue in the forces. Anyone who knows anything about series vehicles, understands that they are often subject to colour changes throughout their life, in the same way that are also subject to engine changes. It's not a valid point.

Oil leaks.

Every Series land rover in the land will be oily, from front to back. Oil leaks need to be attended to when they become serious. This is highlighted by either active leaks when running, or a considerable pool of oil at rest. This vehicle behaved as any other this age, with misting and dribbles from all the various and vulnerable places. Our Land Rovers® can dribble oil because we fill all the levels unlike many other traders, who may send out a vehicle without topping up levels. In our assessment, the oil leaks were completely in line with expectations on a vehicle of this age and price point. Perhaps the independent mechanic was not experienced enough in vintage Land Rovers® to assess whether a leak is serious or not.

Chassis.

In the mechanics words "the chassis is solid." It's nice to note that Mr XXXXXXXXX independent mechanic found something complimentary about the vehicle. It's perhaps a shame that he failed to mention the super sweet, low mileage diesel engine, the slick gear change, the light steering, the benefit of tax exemption, the desirability of a Capstan winch, or the fact that this vehicle was driven the length of England just a few weeks before without issue.

The video shows two perforations under the front spring hangers, which we know were not present upon sale, as the Schutzing that was done on request from Mr XXXXXXXXX, is applied at this point. It seems that these areas have been weakened and perforated. Had Mr XXXXXXXXX gone through our standard sales procedure, we would have presented this vehicle for MOT at GRB in Coxwold. They would have used their CAT tool to assess the chassis, and if they had managed to perforate the chassis, we would have rectified this and presented the vehicle back for MOT. This happens regularly in hard to reach or hidden places, and that's why a garage like ours prefers to use independent garages for MOTs.

In short, although the video highlights some areas that may benefit from future improvement and restoration, it, in no way, renders the vehicle unsafe, faulty or unsatisfactory. 40 year old Land Rovers® will always have elements on them that can be improved... customers who wish to have a "like new" vehicle, can enlist us to bespoke build to new standards. We sell vehicles from £4995 to £21,995. Mr XXXXXXXXX bought an unrestored vehicle at the lower end of our price ranges. Despite this, he acquired a desirable unit, with desirable feature, as previously mentioned. The vehicle was deemed roadworthy at last MOT, and our inspection highlighted, that, considering we are dealing with an old, unrestored vehicle, that it was fit for road use. In claiming that a vehicle has some faults, and is therefore not fit for purpose is not entirely fair... a vintage Land Rover® is fit for trundling around in, tinkering with, popping out to the local pub on a Sunday, or just being shown. They are not new, not modern, and will, by their very nature, have wearing parts. We make it very clear, both on the website, and in the emails we send, that these vehicles are elderly, and will not perform like a newer vehicle. We state,
"All old Land Rovers® will have something that can be improved upon, however good they look..."

In summary, we are very disappointed at the manner in which this purchase has been conducted by Mr XXXXXXXXX. He has attempted to deceive the manner in which he purchased this vehicle, has threatened to slander and defame the good name our company has worked hard to achieve, has not allowed us due time or process to consider best steps in resolving the issues raises and has attempted to embellish weaknesses in the vehicle purchased to gain leverage post sale.

We firmly believe we are a transparent and honest company, supplying vintage vehicles in the best condition possible at the price point. We have a sound customer base and many happy clients, of which we are very proud.

Despite our regret in how Mr XXXXXXXXX has approached concerns he has with his purchase we will continue to strive to amicably resolve the issues and will take the necessary steps in ensuring that all dealings, from BOTH parties, have been conducted, within the confines of English Law.

John Brown

Sitejabber for Business

Gain trust and grow your business with customer reviews.

From the business

Choose from the UK's biggest indoor collection of classic Land Rovers and 4x4s. Browse stock online, give us a call or visit us for a chat.

Company Representative

Thumbnail of user johnb348
John B.

How do I know I can trust these reviews about JohnBrown4x4?

  • Sitejabber’s sole mission is to increase online transparency for buyers and businesses
  • Sitejabber has helped over 200M buyers make better purchasing decisions online
  • Suspicious reviews are flagged by our algorithms, moderators, and community members
Have a question about JohnBrown4x4?