Even the name of this site shows a clear bias. A site that legitimately shares scientific info has no investment or bias. It reports the facts. The first post here is a parody music video about global warming being a scam. Other posts used biased, inflammatory language like "exposed" and "indoctrinated." The one post that appeared to be scientific was from another site and by a man named John O'Sullivan who doesn't list any credentials to show that he actually knows what he's saying. And since those who do have credentials disagree with him, I'm not going to believe him. The bottom line, though, is that a truly scientific site is going to post results. As more information is discovered, it will post those too, even if they contradict previous information. True science has no bias and no investment in one result or another.