Seller, stefielouhoo, posted a stock photo ad of a model wearing a "dress", The dress she was selling was labeled women's size M. The dress in the photo reached to within a couple of inches above the model's knees. However, what I received was clearly a top, with a measured shoulder to hem length of 29 inches and NO SIZE ON THE LABEL. It barely reached to the top of my thighs. When I requested a refund, she admonished "This is a matter of fit, which is not a reason for opening a case... You could have asked for measurements of the item yet you chose not to do that. Unfortunately, there is not a set standard for what every size medium in the world should measure. Ultimately, you should have asked for measurements to assure a proper fit." Well, I expect a size M dress to reach at least a few inches below my panties and not expose them, which is how a size M fits me. If the seller had just posted an actual photo of the article of clothing on a size M model, it would have been a completely different outcome. Why would an honest seller post pictures that are not of the actual piece of clothing they are peddling if not to deceive the buyer? Honesty in advertising is key. And the length of this piece is not even close to being justified as a dress.