It seems like a well intentioned site, the layout seems good, however the response received from the request I submitted, clearly outlined a demonstration of deflection of responsibility, at least from one perspective. Responsibility related to actual site content. While the intentions of this site are to give you accurate information. Pictures of a security fence on a property where there is no security fence could be demonstrated as the responsibility of the customer content uploader. It could also be described as a "property managers" responsibility to be the content uploader. Perhaps a completely arguable justification of honesty when used in conjunction with a data field on their website located in the listings floorplans section of certain rental properties that should accurately display a specific dollar amount instead only displaying the data "$ask". So, Rentable.co will be able to conveniently explain their role and responsibility when it comes to why that is, which was explained above. As if any user will know how many dollars $ask is. Well, at least when you read the next row in the submitted dataset it might just say "1725+" which is definitely another direct representation of how the "+" when added to a specific amount is more accurate and more honest than when a specific amount is listed. Maybe the same justification could be used to argue the absence of a period in a set of 4 digits because the result would be the same amount of money. Maybe even more arguable would be the validity of honesty in advertising being a great concept, but only on Tuesdays. I did like the look and feel of their site though.